Monthly Archives: January 2020

@talkaboutIF bot guidelines

The @talkaboutIF bot was developed to provide an avenue for library workers to contribute to #timetotalkaboutIF discussions who may not otherwise be able to participate safely. All submissions to @talkaboutIF are anonymous. Posts DM’d to this account will be posted to the account feed without attribution. Hashtags, images, gifs, links can be submitted. The content of posts will be evaluated before posting to ensure a safe and welcoming environment for the community. Posts will not be accepted if they:

  1. Include mentions of or “at” specific twitter accounts
    2. Personal attacks on living individuals (By all means beef with John Locke)
    3. Degrade or stereotype groups or individuals on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, ability, or gender identity and expression
    4. Include behaviour that could be considered trolling (multiple submissions of the same content, pile-ons)
    5. Contain spam, illegal content, and any other content deemed irrelevant to the stated purpose of the account

Bot moderators have the right to make these decisions at their discretion and is not subject to appeal.

[If you really feel an overwhelming, uncontrollable urge to be a hateful dick and post this stuff under your own account, be aware we will be actively monitoring discussions and reporting posts that violate Twitter Rules. You aren’t welcome here.]

#timetotalkaboutIF campaign

What

#timetotalkaboutIF is an invitation to open a discussion about libraries and their approach to intellectual freedom as a core value. All are welcome to engage in this discussion online and/or in person at the OLA Superconference. Inspired by the 2005 Quebec student movement and their symbolic red squares, we invite library workers to wear a square of green felt and/or change their Twitter avatar to solid green to signal their willingness to engage in this discussion.

Who

We are library workers who feel that it is time to have a frank discussion about the current approach to intellectual freedom in libraries. We are concerned that the hierarchy of values in libraries prioritizes the ideology of intellectual freedom over human rights and the library’s commitment to inclusion. Recent events have presented our profession with challenging questions about the ways in which we build and sustain genuine relationships with marginalized communities while still championing the right to freedom of expression and open debate. We believe that this is a nuanced conversation that needs to be ongoing and inclusive of various perspectives and that are not necessarily absolutist in their approach. We seek to create space to bridge the tension between theory and practice, and to ultimately find a way to translate theory into practical application for those who work on the front lines. We also seek to invite policy makers to engage with alternative viewpoints about intellectual freedom, and attempt to chart a new way forward.

When/Where

Anytime is the right time to talk amongst your colleagues and online, but we’ve arranged for a formal time and place for library workers from all sectors to come together for a start:

January 31, 11-12

OLA Superconference – Unconference Centre

The digital component of the discussion will carry on through the month of January 2020. Participants can participate via Twitter, either by using your own account (make sure to use the hashtag) or via the anonymous bot @talkaboutIF (details below) or via the anonymous online form.

UPDATE:

There will be a Twitter chat on Monday, January 27 at 8pm EST. Anonymous contributions will be facilitated (details coming soon).

How

The following are three guiding questions that – while challenging – we feel are of paramount importance to the current climate and the very real challenges we are facing.

  1. In what ways does the current approach  to IF undermine the human rights of marginalized groups of people?
  2. How can library workers maintain and build relationships in the community when upholding IF conflicts with a commitment to inclusion?
  3. In what ways are the collections that libraries build different from the ways that space is made available to the public?
  4. How are we assessing risk in decision making related to IF? How can library boards/leadership best prepare to meet such challenges?

Instructions for the greening campaign

Green square:

Email or DM jschmidt@ryerson.ca or @janeschmidt to receive one via snail mail; send me your address, I’ll mail you a square. Alternatively, you can make your own. They will also be available throughout the conference site in various locations – it will be like a treasure hunt!

Green avatar for Twitter:

You can use the Twibbon app to add a transparent green layer to your Twitter avatar here: https://twibbon.com/Support/timetotalkaboutif

OR

Download this image to change your avatar to green throughout the month of January.green avatar

About the @talkaboutIF bot

Thanks to my good friend, John Fink (@adr) and coding from Tim Ribaric (@elibtronic), folks who wish to contribute to the conversation anonymously can submit a direct message to the @talkaboutIF Twitter account. Here’s how it works:

DM @talkaboutIF with your grievances

Your personal identifying info is scrubbed

Your grievance is aired

The bot will delete your DM and the response DM; delete your original message and the response you get

Patience please! This only runs once ever 15 minutes

If your DM is longer than 280 characters, it won’t post

Questions? Hit me up on Twitter and I’ll do my best to get answers.